Evolution The Remarkable History Of A Scientific Theory Pdf Writer
The Teleological ArgumentChapter 3:Philosophy of ReligionProofs for the Existence of GodTheTeleological ArgumentThe Teleological Argument or proof for the existence of a deity issometimes called the Design argument. Even if you have never heard ofeither argument, you are probably familiar with the central idea of theargument, i.e.there exists so much intricatedetail, design, and purpose in the world that we must suppose acreator. All of the sophistication and incredible detail we observe innature could not have occurred by chance.When looking at the universe people might see more order or disorderas is their predilection and they might see it in varying proportions.When examining the universe and seeing complexity and order there are avariety of explanations for how it may have come about. Somepeople want an explanation backed by evidence and without violations ofreasoning and some do not want such explanations. Some want theeasiest explanations with the least amount of thought.
Some merelyaccept the explanations that they have received when growing up.VIEW:TheTeleological Argument is the second traditional “a posteriori” argumentfor the existence of God. Perhaps the most famous variant of this argument is the WilliamPaley’s “watch” argument. Basically, this argument says that after seeing a watch, withall its intricate parts, which work together in a precise fashion tokeep time, one must deduce that this piece of machinery has a creator,since it is far too complex to have simply come into being by some othermeans, such as evolution.The skeleton of the argument is as follows:Premises:1. Human artifacts are products ofintelligent design; they have a purpose.2. The universe resembles these humanartifacts.3. Therefore:It is probable that the universe is a product of intelligent design, andhas a purpose.4.
However, the universe is vastly morecomplex and gigantic than a human artifact is.Conclusion: Therefore:There is probably a powerful and vastly intelligent designer who created theuniverse.Paley's Teleological Argument For TheExistence Of God'For what can be known about God is plain to them,because God has shown it to them. Ever since the creation of the worldhis invisible nature, namely, his eternal power and diety, has beenclearly percieved in the things that have been made. So they are withoutexcuse.'
Romans1:19-20I.) The Teleological Argument:'Teleological' = from the end or purposeexhibited by the universeThe term teleological comes from the Greekwords telosand logos. Telos means thegoalor end or purpose of a thingwhile logos means thestudy of the very nature of a thing. The suffixologyor the study of is also from the noun logos. To understand the logos ofa thing means to understand the very why and how of that thing's nature- it is more than just a simple studying of a thing. The teleologicalargument is an attempt to prove the existence of God that begins withthe observation of the purposiveness of nature. The teleologicalargument moves to the conclusion that there must exist a designer. Theinference from design to designer is why the teleological argument isalso known as the design argument.i.) The basic premise, of all teleological arguments forthe existence of God, is that the world exhibits an intelligent purposebased on experience from nature such as its order, unity, coherency,design and complexity.
Hence, there must be an intelligent designer toaccount for the observed intelligent purpose and order that we canobserve.ii.)Paley's teleological argument is based on an analogy:Watchmaker is to watch as God is to universe. Just as a watch, with itsintelligent design and complex function must have been created by anintelligent maker: a watchmaker, the universe, with all its complexityand greatness, must have been created by an intelligent and powerfulcreator. Therefore a watchmaker is to watch as God is to universe.II. READ:by Massimo PigliucciREAD: by Bruce and Frances MartinSkeptical Inquirer magazine: Nov 2003General, by Jerry Adler,Newsweek, February 7, 2005,by Alan Leshner, AAAS CEO,Philadelphia Inquirer, February 2, 2005, byEvan Ratliff, Wired, October 2004,by Fiona Proffitt,Science, June 25, 2004American Geological InstituteTheprovides up-to-date listings ofanti-evolution activity around the nation.and its member societies are available atThe booklet Evolution and theFossil Record, produced by AGI and the Paleontological Society, is now.Written by paleontologists John Pojeta Jr. And Dale Springer, thisnon-technical introduction to evolution aims to help the general public gaina better understanding of one of the fundamental underlying concepts ofmodern science.Thefeatures a series of perspectiveson the Kansas situation from geoscience community leaders along with columnsaddressing the ramifications from both public policy and curriculumdevelopment standpoints. Theis devoted to the evolutiondebate.
Department of Medical History and Bioethics, University of Wisconsin 'Ed Larson is both a historian and a writer who knows how to bring his subject alive. In Evolution: The Remarkable History of a Scientific Theory he combines the latest historical scholarship with an understanding of recent issues in science, religion and social debate.
Articles include 'The Politics of Education in Kansas' by M. LeeAllison, 'Studying Evolution and Keeping the Faith' by Patricia H. Kelley,'Evolution Grades for the States' (a review of the Fordham report), and 'HotSpots across the U.S.' (an overview of recent flare-ups).The National Academies haveproduced several publications for teachers and the general public. They areavailable, along with an extensiveis a compilation of statements by scientific, educational,religious, and civil rights organizations published by the.
It is available online at:A.The American Association for theAdvancement of Science (AAAS) has anon their Web site. It contains a current issues section,information on state science education standards and various state evolutionissues.EvolutionOne stop source forDetailed explanations of the mechanisms of evolution and the history of lifeon EarthThe relevance of evolutionary theory to our everyday livesMultiple lines of scientific evidence relating to evolutionThis interactive and entertaining. Explore Darwin's life and the theory heproposed, find resources for teachers and students and a library ofadditional resources.This site claims to be the mostextensive collection ofDarwin's writings ever published and includes The Origin of Speciesand other books, volumes of letters, and articles published in periodicals.Although the site appears to come from the British Library, it is producedby a historian affiliated with Cambridge University.A fascinating look at both sides ofthe issue from aUniversity of Missourilaw professor. Includes links to websites supporting evolutionisttheory and creationism.More about Darwin himself than aboutevolution, this entertaining site offers great detail about Darwin's life and science in the late1800s. It includes a long list of links.This website presents the non-Darwinist andnon-creationist point of view known as intelligent design, which holds thatthe universe is the product of intelligent thinking.A very large young-Earth creationist website.Although most material is in English, it includes pages in ten Asian andEuropean languages.This website is built around essays and articlesaddressing the evolution/creationism controversy from a mainstream scienceviewpoint.
Lots of links to websites on both sides of the issue.The NCSE is a nonprofit organization dedicated todefending the teaching of evolution in public schools.Preview the diverse work of this award-winningphotographer at this site, which includes photo galleries, a shortbiography, and more.This organization provides acommittee of experts in all areas of scientific and technological endeavorand gives independent, objective advice on critical international andnational issues.Browne, Janet. Charles Darwin: Voyaging. Knopf, 1995.Browne, Janet. Charles Darwin: The Power ofPlace.
Evolution The Remarkable History Of A Scientific Theory Pdf Writer Pdf
Knopf, 2002.Darwin, Charles. On the Origin of Species byMeans of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favored Races in theStruggle for Life. John Murray, 1859.
(Modern editions are availablefrom many publishers.)Desmond, Adrian, and James Moore.Darwin.Michael Joseph, 1991.Eldredge, Niles. The Pattern of Evolution.
Freeman andCompany, 1999.Larson, Edward J. Evolution: TheRemarkable History of a Scientific Theory. Modern Library, 2004.Title: WasDarwin Wrong?, By: Quammen, David, National Geographic, 00279358,Nov2004, Vol. 206, Issue 5Was DarwinWrong? The evidence for Evolution is overwhelming.View also:Outcome AssessmentThis argument or proof does notestablish the actual existence of a supernatural deity. Itattempts to argue for the existence of such a being by makingcomparisons that are questionable and using evidence that is alsoquestionable and for which there alternative explanations and that isnot rationally legitimate. While the argument can not be used toconvert a non-believer to a believer, the faults in the argument do notprove that there is no god.
Thedemands that the positive claim that there is a supernatural deity beestablished by reason and evidence and this argument does not meet thatstandard. The believer in god can use the argument to establishthe mere logical possibility that there is a supernatural deity or atleast that it is not irrational to believe in the possibility that thereis such a being. The argument does not establish any degree ofprobability at all when there are alternative explanations for theexistence of features of the known universe.OUTCOME:The Argument:Premises:1.)Human artifacts are products of intelligent design.2.)The universe resembles humanartifacts.3.)Therefore the universe is aproduct of intelligent design.4.)But the universe is complex andgigantic, in comparison to human artifacts.Conclusion:Therefore, there probably is apowerful and vastly intelligent designer who created the universe.Problem with argument:1. XPremises are false or questionable2. Premises are irrelevant3. Premises Contain the Conclusion –Circular Reasoning4. XPremises are inadequate to support the conclusion5.
XAlternative arguments exist with equal or greater supportThis argument or proof has flaws in it and would not convince a rationalperson to accept its conclusion. This is not because someone who doesnot believe in a deity will simply refuse to accept based on emotions orpast history but because it is not rationally compelling of acceptance ofits conclusion.Proceed to theArguments based upon experience in the next sectionsProceed to theIntroduction to Philosophy by is licensed under a.Return to.